I caught this article over on Drudge about military robots, and lost it when I read this [emphasis mine]:
Increasingly autonomous, gun-totting robots developed for warfare could easily fall into the hands of terrorists and may one day unleash a robot arms race, a top expert on artificial intelligence told AFP.
“They pose a threat to humanity,” said University of Sheffield professor Noel Sharkey ahead of a keynote address Wednesday before Britain’s Royal United Services Institute. [...]
The first three armed combat robots fitted with large-caliber machine guns deployed to Iraq last summer, manufactured by US arms maker Foster-Miller, proved so successful that 80 more are on order, said Sharkey.
But up to now, a human hand has always been required to push the button or pull the trigger.
It we are not careful, he said, that could change.
Military leaders “are quite clear that they want autonomous robots as soon as possible, because they are more cost-effective and give a risk-free war,” he said.
That’s an out and out lie. I have a close friend who is an engineer, designing robots for the military. And he says that though the engineers would like to have the ability to let the robot fire autonomously, it’s the military brass who insist on looping a human into that decision making process.
So what could motivate this clown to assert the exact opposite? I couldn’t find anything on the guy’s home page or Wikipedia page to indicate his political leanings or any long standing sort of activism. But I did find his Guardian article on which this AFP piece appears to be based:
But fully autonomous robots that make their own decisions about lethality are high on the US military agenda. The US National Research Council advises “aggressively exploiting the considerable warfighting benefits offered by autonomous vehicles”. They are cheap to manufacture, require less personnel and, according to the navy, perform better in complex missions. One battlefield soldier could start a large-scale robot attack in the air and on the ground.
That sounds like a bad inference and a quote taken out of context. The Guardian doesn’t provide a link to the US National Research Council piece that is quoted (natch) nor do they even say who that council is (I’ve for one have never heard of them).
So I guess it’s hard to say whether or not this is just publicity seeking from a loudmouth professor, or some sort of anti-military agenda (though he does want an international agreement banning robots from making lethal decisions). Whatever it is, it’s bunk.
Tags: Military, Noel Sharkey, Robots
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, February 27th, 2008 at 11:00 am and is filed under News & Politics, technology.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
One Response to “Media Lies About Military Robots”
March 23rd, 2008 at 5:17 am
I am the “loudmouth” professor in question here. I have to say that I don’t blame you for doubthing what I have written. I found it hard to believe myself until I read thousands of pages of military plans and spoke to top military brass myself. The Guardian is a newspaper and does not permit the use of references. I have listed some sources for the military plans below (including the research council that you have not heard of). They are all in the public domain and can be found easily with a goodle search. If you have difficulty I can look out the web links for you. You should read these and pass them on to your engineer friend so that he can see what is going on as well. You also ought to look out at the many press quotes from US general and admirals about the use of autonomous weapons. Then maybe we can talk about the in a more informed manner.
I certainly have no anti-military agenda. I am well aware that my right to my freedom of expression depends on brave people prepared to put their lives on the line. My sole concern for bringing this matter to the attention of the public is that the field that I have been working in for almost thirty years is going to be responsible for taking many innocent lives.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030, Office of the Secretary of Defense USA, 2005
The Navy Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (UUV) Master Plan, Department of the Navy, USA, November 9, 2004
Joint Robotics Program Master Plan FY2005, LSD (AT&L) Defense Systems/ Land Warfare and Munitions 3090 Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-3090
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001, Public Law 106-398, Congress mandated in Section 220 that “It shall be a goal of the Armed Forces to achieve the fielding of unmanned, remotely controlled technology such that… by 2015, one-third of the operational ground combat vehicles are unmanned.”
Committee on Autonomous Vehicles in Support of Naval Operations National Research Council (2005) Autonomous Vehicles in Support of Naval Operations, Washington DC: The National Academies Press
Unmanned Systems Roadmap 2007-2032, Memorandum for secretaries of the military departments, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, chief of staff of the Army, chief of Naval operations, chief of staff of the air force, commandant of the Marine Corps, director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, December 10th, 2007
Leave a Reply